Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22003 (CHH)

MAMTA VERMA ALIAS MAMTA BENELE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/1399/2021 · 2026-06-18

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:25015 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1399 of 2021 1 - Mamta Verma Alias Mamta Benele Aged About 27 Years R/o Vandana Colony, District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Of Police Station Jagdalpur, District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Superintendent Of Police, District Jagdalpur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Aditya Shrivastava S/o Atul Shrivastava R/o Block No. 8, Housing Board Colony Lalbag, Jagdalpur, Bastar Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : None. For Respondent/State : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Government Advocate For Respondent No.03: Mr. PK Tulsyan, Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice (Order on Board) 19.06.2026 1. None appears nor is any representation made on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. 2. By filing the present petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the Learned Additional Sessions Judge(FTC), Jagdalpur (C.G) to add the provisions of THE SCHEDULED CASTES AND THE SCHEDULED TRIBES (PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES) ACT, 1989 against SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 respondent no. 3 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code in Special case bearing number 55/2021 pending before it for proper adjudication in the interest of justice” 3. As per the status report received from the office, the trial has already been concluded on 17.2.2025. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous as nothing survives for consideration in this petition by this Court. 4. Consequently, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No orders as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice s@if