Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 22000 (PNJ)

SHARMILA AND OTHERS v. APOORVA KUMAR IAS AND OTHERS

COCP/1696/2026 · 2026-05-27

Harpreet Kaur Jeewan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP-1696-2026 116 Sharmila and others Apoorva Kumar Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Present: Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Birla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondents. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL) 1. 2026 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sharmila and others versus Apoorva Kumar Singh and others HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Birla, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, for the respondents. HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1696-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 .....…Petitioners ........Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Birla, Advocate, Mr. Sharad Aggarwal, Addl. A.G., Haryana, HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN, J. (ORAL) ATUL SETHI 2026.05.30 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh COCP-1696-2026 2. As per the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping in view the policy mentioned therein. It has been further directed that quo with regard to the working of the employees would be maintained till the orders are passed by the authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner intend to file a review application to the aforesaid order dated 15.05.2026. 4. Learned State counsel stated that case of the petitioner shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench of this Court. 5. In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is disposed of at this stage having rendered infructuous. In case no decision is taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in terms of the aforesaid order pas liberty to seek revival of this petition or file a afresh petition. 6. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. 27.05.2026 atulsethi Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2026 (O&M) -2- As per the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping view the policy mentioned therein. It has been further directed that with regard to the working of the employees would be maintained till the orders are passed by the authorities. Learned counsel for the petitioner to file a review application to the aforesaid order dated 15.05.2026. Learned State counsel stated that case of the petitioner shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is disposed of at this stage having rendered infructuous. In case no decision is taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in terms of the aforesaid order passed in the LPA, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of this petition or file a afresh petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : As per the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping view the policy mentioned therein. It has been further directed that status with regard to the working of the employees would be maintained till Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners to file a review application to the aforesaid order dated 15.05.2026. Learned State counsel stated that case of the petitioner shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is disposed of at this stage having rendered infructuous. In case no decision is taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in sed in the LPA, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of this petition or file a afresh petition. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand disposed of. (HARPREET KAUR JEEWAN) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No As per the aforesaid order, the State has been directed to examine individual cases of the writ petitioners for regularization, keeping status with regard to the working of the employees would be maintained till s Learned State counsel stated that case of the petitioner shall be considered in the light of the aforesaid order passed by the Division Bench In view of the above facts and circumstances, present petition is disposed of at this stage having rendered infructuous. In case no decision is taken within six months by the respondents in the matter of the petitioner, in sed in the LPA, the petitioner would be at ATUL SETHI 2026.05.30 14:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh