Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 220 (RAJ)

GYARSILAL KUMAWAT S/O RAMDEV KUMAWAT v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3362/2026 · 2026-03-12

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:10428] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Third Bail Application No. 3362/2026 Gyarsilal Kumawat S/o Ramdev Kumawat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Gram Rampura, Police Station Thoi, Tehsil Srimadhopur, District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.K. Lamba Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary Mr. Abhijeet Prajapati For Respondent(s) For Complainant : : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP Mr. Prince Choudhary with Mr. Sultan Singh Kuri HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 12/03/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this third bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.263/2025 registered at Police Station Thoi, District Sikar for offences under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 127(2), 307 and 333 BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that prior to the present incident, from the side of petitioner, several FIRs were lodged against the victim and owing to this enmity, present FIR has been lodged solely on false and concocted [2026:RJ-JP:10428] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3362/2026] grounds. He further submits that no injury has been specifically attributed to the present petitioner. The injuries allegedly sustained by the victim are on the legs, which do not constitute vital parts of the body. The co-accused-Bhagwan Chhitarmal Mistri and Sushil Kumawat have already got benefit of bail by this Court on 21.01.2026. Petitioner is behind the bars since 04.12.2025. Though five criminal antecedents have been reported against the present petitioner but it is submitted that four of them have already been decided. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, accordingly, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the third bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Gyarsilal Kumawat S/o Ramdev Kumawat, shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before the Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/30