2026:JHHC:22065 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5805 of 2026 Kasim Raja @ Md. Kasim Ansari @ Kasim Ansari, Son of Liyakat Ansari, aged about 38 years. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Afaque Rashidi, Advocate : Ms. Sushmita Kumari, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Tiwari, Spl. P.P --- 07/27.07.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 07.05.2026 in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No. 85 of 2022, for the alleged offence registered under Section 354(A), 354(C), 509 of Indian Penal Code and Section 66E, 67 of I.T. Act pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted on 31.05.2026 against the petitioner and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. By referring to the first information report, learned counsel has submitted that as per the first information report, certain obscene photo and video were made viral through Facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp on 10.09.2022. He has submitted that none of the details as mentioned in the first information report belonged to the petitioner and as per the counter affidavit, they belonged to two persons namely Md. Irfan and Md. Ghaysuddin Gujar Ansari, who are said to be working in Mumbai along with the petitioner. Learned counsel has submitted that those two persons have stated that it was the petitioner who was using the mobile and the SIM and apart from this, there is no material to connect the petitioner. Those two persons are not co-accused in this case. 2026:JHHC:22065 2 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions and the charge sheet having been submitted, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge (Cyber Crime), Giridih in connection with Nimiaghat P.S. Case No. 85 of 2022 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 27.07.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-28.07.2026