CHAVALI PADMAVATHI, E.G. DIST v. PRL SECY, ENDOWMENTS DEPT, HYD & 3 OT
WP/12493/2014 · 2026-02-01
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21995 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21995 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010330092014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12493/2014 Between:
1. CHAVALI PADMAVATHI, E.G. DIST, D/O. CH.VENKATA CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC: MANAGER, GROUP OF TEMPLES, RYALI VILLAGE, ATREYAPURAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. PRL SECY ENDOWMENTS DEPT HYD 3 OT, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. 3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, RAJAHMUNDRY, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, Order or direction more
-2- HN, J W.P.No.12493_2014 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in rejecting the petitioner claim to extended the benefit of time scale notionally from the date of appointment i.e., on 01- 04-1984 instead of 01-09-1989 by his procedings L.Dis.No.A2/39942/2013, dated 13-02-2014, even though, the 3rd respondent recommended by his proceedings Rc.No.B4/9993/2013, dated 13-12-2013 is illegal, arbitrary and violation of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the proceedings vide L.Dis.No.A2/39942/2013, dated 13-02-2014 issued by the 4th respondent, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 15691 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the orders passed by the 4th respondnet proccedings L.Dis.No.A2/39942/2013, dated 13-02-2014, pending disposal of the above writ petition, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
-3- HN, J W.P.No.12493_2014 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.12493 OF 2014 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the petitioner has attained the age of superannuation and that cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further consideration. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:02.02.2026 NKA
-4- HN, J W.P.No.12493_2014 135 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12493 of 2014 Date: 02.02.2026
NKA