Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21993 (JHR)

MD AMZAD @ AMZAD HUSSAIN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./4104/2026 · 2026-07-27

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:22168] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4104 of 2026 1. Md. Amzad @ Amzad Hussain aged about 50 years, Son of Late Hussain. 2. Md. Tausif @ Tausif Ansari @ Shekh aged about 25 years, Son of Md. Amzad @ Amzad Hussain Both Resident of Village- Gadokhar, P.O.- Pelawal, P.S.- Katkamsandi (Pelawal O.P.), Dist.- Hazaribag. ..... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shailendra Jit, Advocate. For the State : Ms. Sushma Aind, A.P.P. ------ 05/ 27.07.2026 After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this petition so far as petitioner No. 1 Md. Amzad @ Amzad Hussain is concerned. 2. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has got no objection. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner No. 1 is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner No. 2 and learned A.P.P for the State. 6. The petitioner No. 2 is apprehending his arrest in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 125, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag. 7. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner No. 2 submits that so far as petitioner No. 2 is concerned, there are general and [ 2026:JHHC:22168] -2- omnibus allegation against him and the informant and the petitioner No. 1 are own brothers. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner No. 2. 8. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of making assault. On this ground, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 9. On perusal of the FIR, it transpires that there is direct allegation against petitioner No. 1 of making assault and due to which, son of the informant has received grievous injury and there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner No.2. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner No. 2. 10. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner No. 2 is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Hazaribag, in connection with Katkamsandi P.S. Case No. 04 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-27.07.2026 Amitesh/-