2026:HHC:37783 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. Ex. Pet. No.1867 of 2026 Decided on: 7th September, 2026 Neena Rani ....Petitioner versus State of H.P. and others ...Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr.Justice Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rupinder Singh Thakur, Additional Advocate General for respondents No.1 & 2-State. Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate for respondent No.3. Jiya Lal Bhardwaj, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the mandate contained in the judgment dated 07.04.2026 passed in CWP No.4178 of 2026, titled, Neena Rani vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, has been complied with and the respondent/competent authority has decided the representation made by the petitioner. 2. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present petition and the same is 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2026:HHC:37783 2 accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( Jiya Lal Bhardwaj ) 7th September, 2026 Judge (naveen)