APHC010329162022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 19792/2022 Between: 1. JONNA RAMAIAH, S/O.JONNA VEERA SESHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, BUSINESS, D.NO. 1-617-10 AND 158, WATER TANK ROAD, KADIRI TOWN, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PUTTAPARTI, SATYASAL DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KADIRI URBAN POLICE STATION, KADIRI, SATYASAI DISTRICT. 4. SRI N VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, S/O. CHINNA VENKATA SWAMY REDDY, AGE 58 YEARS, D.NO. 1-1110E, EX. MP STREET, KADIRI, SATYASAI DISTRICT. 5. SRI CS SRIDHAR REDDY, S/O. C. RAMA SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, D.NO. 6-3-116-2, SRINILAYAM, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 6. C S SUJAN REDDY, S/O. C.S. SRIDHAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 23 YEARS, D.NO. 6-3-116-2, SRINILAYAM, RAMNAGAR, ANANTAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 7. N RAKESH REDDY, S/O. VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, D.NO. 1-1110E, EX. MP STREET, KADIRI, SATYASAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil dispute ie., subject matter of O.S.No. 43 of 2019 on the file of the court of Principal District judge, Anantapuramu pending between the petitioner and the respondents No. 4 to 7 and directing the petitioner to withdraw the said suit 2 by compromising with the respondents 4 to 7,as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently Direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute ie., subject matter of O.S.No.43 of 2019 on the file of the court of Principal District judge, Anantapuramu pending between the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 7 and not to harass him and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M PRASADA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioner for the following relief: < ... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the 3rd respondent in interfering with the civil dispute ie., subject matter of O.S.No.43 of 2019 on the file of the court of Principal District judge, Anantapuramu pending between the petitioner and the respondents No. 4 to 7 and directing the petitioner to withdraw the said suit by compromising with the respondents 4 to 7,as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and also being violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Consequently Direct the respondents not to interfere with the civil dispute ie., subject matter of O.S.No.43 of 2019 on the file of the court of Principal District judge, Anantapuramu pending between the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 7 and not to harass him and pass ...= None represented for the Petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader on instructions would submit that in the light of the interim order passed by this Court on 08.07.2022 in IA No.1 of 2022, respondent Police did not interfere in the civil disputes between the parties and did not call the petitioner to the Police Station and requested to dispose of the Writ Petition by passing appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made, this Writ Petition is disposed of. However, respondent Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 07.01.2026 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 19792 of 2022 07.01.2026 Mjl /*