APHC010328802007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 669/2007 Between: 1. K.PADMAVATHI, W/O.N. SUBRAHMANYAM R/O.D.NO.C-61, HARIPURAM COLONY OPP: TO AGRL. COLLEGE STAFF QUARTERS TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. N SUBRAHMANYAM, S/o. N. Pradesi Assistant Executive Engineer O/o. Executive Engineer, Agrl. College Campus Agricultrual University, Tirupathi, Chittoor District R/o. at D.No.4-4-569-C, Nehru Nagar ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CMAMP 1576 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the order and decree passed in HMOP.No.17 of 2004 dated 4.6.2007 on the file of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Tirupathi. Counsel for the Appellant: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 669/2007 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 19.01.2026, the following order was passed: “The appeal has been filed by the wife challenging the decree of divorce granted in favour of the husband. 2. On 10.12.2025, the following order was passed: “Sri T.C.Krishnan, learned counsel appears for the appellant and submits that since the matter has been listed after long time, he requires some time to obtain latest instructions from the appellant. List the matter on 24.12.2025 under the same caption.” 3. Sri T.C.Krishnan, learned counsel for the appellant prays for further time as last opportunity to obtain instructions. 4. In view of the interim suspension of the impugned order, we grant one more opportunity to obtain instructions. 5. Post after three (03) weeks.” 2. Today, there is no representation for the appellant. 3. The matter pertains to the year 2007 and is listed under the caption „old matters‟. The cause-list mentions that the old matters may not be adjourned. 4. In view of the above, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for „want of prosecution‟. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI,J _____________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Dated: 09.02.2026 AG 222 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 669/2007 Dated: 09.02.2026 AG