Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21984 (AP)

THE CSI PRIMARY SCHOOLS v. SRI KVN KUMAR

CC/1708/2025 · 2026-01-04

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010325032025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1708/2025 Between: 1. THE CSI PRIMARY SCHOOLS, REP BY ITS SECRETARY-CUM- CORRESPONDENT, MR. M.AUGUSTINE SAMUEL, ADAVIKODIYAMBEDU VILLAGE, PICHATUR MANDAL.TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 2. THE C.S.I PRIMARY SCHOOLS, REP BY ITS SECRETARY-CUM- CORRESPONDENT, MR. M.AUGUSTINE SAMUEL, VENGALATHUR VILLAGE, PICHATUR MANDAL,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. 3. THE C.S.I PRIMARY SCHOOLS, REP BY ITS SECRETARY-CUM- CORRESPONDENT, MR. M.AUGUSTINE SAMUEL, MADANAMBEDU VILLAGE, SATHAYAVEDU MANDAL,TIRUPATI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SRI KVN KUMAR, MA,B.Ed. District Educational Officer, Tiruchanur, Tirupati District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased punish the Respondent No. 4 in W.P No. 3514 of 2025 under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court Act, 1971 for wilful, wanton, disobedience of the orders of this Honble High Court, dated 12.02.2025 passed in W.P.No.3514 of 2025 by the Honble Lordships and pass 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. NAGA RAJU KOLLATI Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE No.1708 of 2025 ORDER: This Court, vide order dated 12.02.2025 in W.P.No.3514 of 2025, directed the 4th respondent therein to examine the petitioners’ representation dated 20.06.2024, and pass appropriate orders, and communicate the said decision to the petitioners within a period of four weeks. For non compliance of the said order, present contempt case has been filed. Learned counsel for respondents have filed reply and at paragraph No.8 it is stated that some delay has been occurred in complying with the orders of this Court. It is further stated that after careful examination of the representation, speaking orders have been issued by the DEO Tirupati, vide Rc.No.491/C1/2025 dated 23.05.2025. Inasmuch as the respondents have complied with the orders passed by this Court, nothing remains in the contempt case to adjudicate further. Therefore, the Contempt Case is closed, if at all the petitioners are aggrieved by the proceedings vide Rc.No.491/C1/2025 dated 23.05.2025, they are at liberty to file fresh writ petition or any other appropriate remedy in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 05.01.2026 KBN 4 55 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Contempt Case No.1708 of 2025 05.01.2026 KKBBNN