( 2026:JHHC:22093 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5585 of 2026 Indal Paswan … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY ------- For the Petitioner : Ms. Tanu Kumari, Advocate For the State : A.P.P ------- 02/27.07.2026 Heard Ms. Tanu Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. The prayer for bail of the petitioner was earlier dismissed as withdrawn in B.A. No. 1357 of 2026 vide order dated 04.06.2026. Subsequently, after six days the present bail application has been filed on 10.06.2026 taking a plea that out of 12 cases instituted against the petitioner, he has been acquitted in 8 cases. It appears that the petitioner was involved in demanding levy on behalf of a banned organization and at paragraphs-35 and 37 of the case diary it has come that on the instruction of the petitioner Rs.10,000/- was paid as a levy amount. Regard being had to the above, I am not inclined to reconsider the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner which consequently stands rejected once again. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) Shamim/- Uploaded on: 28 /07/2026