Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21971 (AP)

MANYAM SAGAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4725/2022 · 2026-02-26

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010321402022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4725/2022 Between: 1.MANYAM SAGAR, S/O SANKAR RAO, 40 YRS R/O 20-6-31, TOWN NAIDU STREET PARVATHIPURAM VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT 2.MANYAM VANDANA, W/O MANYAM SAGAR, 37 YRS R/O 20-6-31, TOWN NAIDU STREET PARVATHIPURAM VIJAYANAGARAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, AT AMARAVATHI FOR CBI/ACB 2.STATE BANK OF INDIA, ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, BALAJI NAGAR, SIRIPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS ASST. GENERAL MANAGER, RACPC-1. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1.T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1.P S P SURESH KUMAR, Spl. Public Prosecutor for CBI 2.K B RAMANNA DORA The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Ms. P.Akhila Naidu, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been filed. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of with liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 27.02.2026 VTS