[2026:RJ-JP:17015] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6594/2026 Syed Asif Ali S/o Syed Ali, Aged About 57 Years, R/o 5, Mohalla Sadat Toda Road, Jim Ke Pas, Malpura, Tonk, Rajasthan-304502 ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur 2. Director, Elementary Education Rajasthan, Bikaner, Rajasthan 3. District Education Officer, Elementary Education Tonk. 4. Block Elementary Education Officer, Malpura, Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vikas Jakhar. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN Order 22/04/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashment of suspension order dated 23.10.2000 and sought certain directions for the respondents to revoke the suspension of the petitioner and for the relief of reinstatement with all consequential benefits. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner was suspended by order dated 23.10.2000 on account of he allegedly involved in a criminal case relating to grave offence under Sections 147, 148, 302, 302/149, 201 and 120-B of IPC. It is stated that the petitioner was acquitted from the Criminal Case on 02.12.2024 and, thereafter, the petitioner made a representation dated 03.01.2025 requesting the respondents to revoke the suspension and [2026:RJ-JP:17015] (2 of 2) [CW-6594/2026] for the relief of reinstatement with all consequential benefits, however, no action is taken on such application without passing any order, either rejecting or quashing of order of suspension of the petitioner, therefore, the present writ petition is filed. 3. Since the petitioner has already been acquitted in a criminal case and there is no parallel department proceedings independent of criminal case, the respondents are required to consider the representation dated 03.01.2025 for the reliefs he has prayed in the said application and take a decision thereon forthwith. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the respondents to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order. 5. The petitioner has also given liberty to file a fresh representation before the respondents praying to revoke the suspension order and for the relief of reinstatement with all consequential benefits and if the same is filed, the respondents are directed to consider and decide the said representation alongwith the representation already filed, within the aforesaid time frame. (MUNNURI LAXMAN),J PKS/7