Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21963 (CHH)

DUSHYANT KUMAR TIWARI v. SUNIL KUMAR CHANDEL

CRR/327/2018 · 2026-06-18

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24959 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 327 of 2018 Dushyant Kumar Tiwari S/o Late Shri Tribhuwan Prasad Tiwari Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Bodtara, Tehsil Bhatapara, Station House Officer Bhatrapara Rural, Civil And Revenue District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus Sunil Kumar Chandel S/o Balram Chandel R/o Naipara Ward Bhatapara, Station House Officer Bhatapara City, Tehsil Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar- Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent : None. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 19.06.2026 1. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Sahu, learned counsel for the petitioner. 2. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner with BRIJMOHAN MORLE Digitally signed by BRIJMOHAN MORLE Date: 2026.06.19 19:52:06 +0530 2 the following prayer: “It is therefore, prayed that the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside the impugned order dated 02.02.2018, passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh, in Criminal Appeal No. H- 29/2015 and allow the application filed by the petitioner under the provision of Section 391 of Cr.P.C. read with Section 45 of Evidence Act dated 16.08.2017, in the interest of justice.” 3. As per the status report received, the trial was concluded on 22.02.2022. In view of the same, the relief sought in the present petition has become infructuous, and nothing survives for consideration by this Court in the present petition. 4. Consequently, the present revision petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Registry is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court concerned for necessary information. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Brijmohan