2026:UHC:2558 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No.882 of 2026 Lalit Sabharwal and Another --Petitioners Versus Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority and Others --Respondents Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, learned counsel for petitioners. 2. Mr. Rahul Consul, learned counsel for respondent No.1/MDDA. 3. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand/ respondent No.2. 4. This writ petition has been filed by petitioners on the premise that petitioners are flat owners of the flats constructed by respondent Nos.3 to 6; they want respondent Nos.3 to 6 not to raise construction of similar tower on land adjacent to the tower ‘A’, in which petitioners have purchased their flats saying that it is in violation of the sanction plan. 5. Learned counsel for respondent No.1/ MDDA and respondent No.2 submitted that petitioners may move application under Section 19 read with Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, and therefore, the present writ petition is not maintainable. 6. This Court finds substance in the submission made by learned counsel for 2026:UHC:2558 respondents. In such view of the matter, no interference is required in the matter. 7. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed in-limine. However, petitioners may file application Section 19 read with Section 31 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016, before the concerned Authority. 8. Pending application also stands disposed of. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 09.04.2026 PN