Smt. Katti Uma Maheswari @ Sikharam Umamaheswari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
CRLP/5073/2021 · 2026-02-08
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21959 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21959 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010326262021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5073/2021 Between:
1.SMT. KATTI UMA MAHESWARI @ SIKHARAM UMAMAHESWARI, W/O. SIKHARAM VENKATESWARLU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, OCC HOUSEHOLD, R/O, 1ST LANE, RANIPET, GUDUR TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.
2.SRI. SIKHARAM VENKATESWARLU, S/O, VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/O. 1ST LANE, RANIPET, GUDUR TOWN, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI.
2.SMT DUDALA YOCHANA, W/O. SIKHARAM VENKATA ASRITH, D/O.
DUDALA CHANDRAMOHAN, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O. D.NO. 3/545, TALPAGIRI COLONY, BACKSIDE OF OLD HYUNDAI CAR SHOWROOM, A.K.NAGAR, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S):
1.K PALLAVI Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):
2 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: No representation for the Petitioners. Sri A.Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submits that in the present matter, a chargesheet has already been laid in C.C.No.5330 of 2021 on the file of the learned Judicial First Class Magistrate, Nellore. Considering that four years have elapsed since the filing of the chargesheet and the Petitioners have not sought amendment of the prayer, it appears that the Petitioners are either not interested in prosecuting the matter or that the parties may have arrived at a settlement before the learned Trial Court. In that view of the matter, the Criminal Petition is disposed of granting liberty to the Petitioners to challenge the chargesheet, if they are so advised, and if the same is still pending consideration before the learned Trial Court. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 09.02.2026 VTS