Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21958 (AP)

NAKKA PREMALATHA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/16290/2024 · 2026-01-20

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010321752024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 16290/2024 Between: 1. NAKKA PREMALATHA, W/O LATE JADA SAMUEL VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O D.NO.C-55, SC COLONY, DUPPADA, VIZIANAGARAM. 2. JADA DAVID,, S/O LATE JADA SAMUEL VIJAYA KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, R/O D.NO.C-55, SC COLONY, DUPPADA, VIZIANAGARAM. 3. JADA MARY RANI,, D/O LATE JADA SAMSON VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O D.NO.1-17/12-13, BOBBADIPETA CONTONEMENT, VIZIANAGARAM. 4. JADA RANJITH KUMAR,, S/O LATE JADA SAMSON VIJAY KUMAR, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 1-17/12-13 BOBBADIPETA CONTONEMENT, VIZIANAGARAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT AT VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PENDURTHI MANDAL, PENDURTHI, 2 VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. THE NAGAMALLI NAGAR PLOT OWNERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION, SUJATHA NAGAR, CHINNA MUSIDIVADA, PENDURTHI MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP.BY ITS PRESIDENT MALLA SATISH KUMAR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate writ or any other order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3RD respondent in treating the representation dated 25.4.2024 of the 5TH respondent as an appeal under Section 5(5) of the A.P.Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 vide file in Rc.No.528/2024/LRDT as illegal, contrary to the provisions of the Act, 1971, without jurisdiction and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the proceedings in Rc.No.528/2024/LRDT and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to stay all further proceedings in Rc.No.528/2024/LRDT pending on the file of the 3RD respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition, and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th respondent and its members not to make any constructions over the land an extent of Ac.25.95 cents in Sy.No. 179/2 of Chinamushidivada Village, Pendurthi Mandal, Visakhapatnam District, which is the subject matter of the proceedings in File Rc.No.628/2024/LRDT on the file of the 3rd respondent, initiated on the representation of the 5th respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V ESWARAIAH CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 3 1. GP FOR REVENUE 2. P RAJKUMAR 4 The Court made the following Order: Sri CH. Satya Dev Naidu, the learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners on record seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 21.01.2026 SCH 5 188 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.16290 of 2024 Date: 21.01.2026 SCH