- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28882 WP No. 12299 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 12299 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B.K. ANIL KUMAR S/O. SRI. B.M.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.37, BASAVANAPURA, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, BENGALURU-560083. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. N. R. NAIK, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT, BENGALURU. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB DIVISION, KANDAYA BHAVANA, 2ND FLOOR, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28882 WP No. 12299 of 2026 K.G ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. 4. THE SPECIAL TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. 5. SMT. GURAMMA W/O. SEENAPPA AGED: MAJOR RESIDENT OF CHINNAIAHNAPALYA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT. 6. SRI. NANJUNDAPPA S/O. KRISHNAPPA AGED: MAJOR RESIDENT OF KUMBARANAHALLI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDA PRAYING TO (A) TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN NO.RP/460/2023 DATED 15.09.2025 WHICH IS SET ASIDE THE MUTATION ENTRY EFFECTED IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER BASED ON THE SALE DEED IN RESPECT OF THE LAND MEASURING 2 ACRES 05 GUNTAS AT SY.NO.10/P79 SITUATED AT SONNANAYAKANAPURA VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-K AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28882 WP No. 12299 of 2026 ORAL ORDER Learned AGA accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. In this writ petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 15.09.2025 (Annexure-K) passed by respondent No.2 inter alia, sought a direction to respondent No.5 to question the sale deed which is executed by her predecessor of the respondent No.6. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and upon careful consideration of the impugned order at Annexure-K, it would indicate that the katha in respect of subject land have been made in terms of the judgment and decree passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, at Anekal dated 18.11.2023 in O.S. No.489/2011. 4. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this petition. However, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the same, it is open for the petitioner to take necessary steps in accordance with law. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28882 WP No. 12299 of 2026 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29