Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21954 (BOM)

SOW. ALKABAI VISHWAMBAR SAWANT AND ANR v. VISHWAMBAR JYOTIRAM SAWANT AND OTHERS

SA/560/2023 · 2026-01-08

Shri Mehroz K Pathan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 902(ii).SA-560-2023.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 560 OF 2023 SOW. ALKABAI VISHWAMBAR SAWANT AND ANR VERSUS VISHWAMBAR JYOTIRAM SAWANT AND OTHERS … Advocate for Appellants : Mr. Sonkawade Amarsinha Dharmaraj Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5A and 6 to 10 : Mr. V.G. Kodale Advocate for Respondent Nos. R/1-A to 1-C : Mr. Shubham S. Kote … CORAM : MEHROZ K. PATHAN, J. DATE : 8th JANUARY, 2026 PER COURT : 1. The learned Counsels for the Appellants, as well as for Respondent Nos. 5A and 6 to 10, and the learned Counsel appearing for the newly added Respondents, i.e., the legal heirs of Respondent No. 1 as R/1A to R/1C, have tendered at the bar a copy of the compromise entered into between Alkabai Vishwambhar Sawant, Sunita Harishchandra Solunke, Parmeshwar Vishwambhar Sawant, Manisha Umesh Survase, Yashoda Sandeep Jagdale, Dhondiram Madhavrao Somwanshi, Kushabai Madhavrao Somwanshi, Anita Waghambar Shinde, Prabhakar Ramrao Somwanshi, and Tanaji Prabhakar Somwanshi. . The aforesaid persons have entered into a compromise in respect of Survey No. 127, which has been acquired by the 2026:BHC-AUG:589 2 902(ii).SA-560-2023.doc Government. The terms of the compromise have been placed on record and are marked as ‘X’ for identification. 2. Thus, in view of the said compromise, the Appellants do not want to prosecute the present Second Appeal. The Second Appeal is accordingly disposed of in terms of the compromise. MEHROZ K. PATHAN JUDGE NAJEEB..