SAYED NASIR SAYED SULTAN v. BHAUSAHEB SITARAM SAYAMBAR AND OTHERS
WP/3778/2021 · 2026-01-08
Shri Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21953 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21953 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 of 2 1004-WP.3778.2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 1004 WRIT PETITION NO. 3778 OF 2021 SAYED NASIR SAYED SULTAN VERSUS BHAUSAHEB SITARAM SAYAMBAR AND OTHERS ... Mr. G. R. Syed, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. M. L. Sangit, AGP for Respondent-State. ...
CORAM :
SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
DATE :
8th JANUARY, 2026 P.C.:-
1. Heard learned Advocate for the respective parties.
2. By the present petition, the Petitioner assails the order dated 21.01.2017 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Ashti, District Beed on the application below Exhibit-5 in Regular Civil Suit No. 134 of 2016. The said order was confirmed by the learned District Judge-5, Beed in Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No. 08 of 2017 by
judgment dated 22.10.2019.
3. After arguing for some time, learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the purpose would be served if the Trial Court is
directed to decide the suit itself within a stipulated period.
4. Therefore, without going into merits of the matter, the Trial Court is directed to decide Regular Civil Suit No. 134 of 2016 within a period of one year from today. Tauseef 2026:BHC-AUG:494
2 of 2 1004-WP.3778.2021
5. In view thereof, the petition is disposed of.
(SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef