1 2026:HHC:37774 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.1029 of 2026 Date of Decision: 07.09.2026 ___________________________________________________ Parvinder Kaur ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Vivek Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 05.09.2026, wherein it has been stated that the respondent-Department has challenged the judgment passed in CWP No.2056 of 2023, titled Ghanshyam Dass & ors. Vs. State of HP & others, before the Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court by filing LPA No.295 of 2026 and operation of the impugned judgment therein has been ordered to be stayed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:37774 2. Therefore, in view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition at this stage. 3. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any, at this stage. However, the petitioner is at liberty to revive the contempt petition as and when the occasion arises to do so. ( Sushil Kukreja ) September 07, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)