Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21950 (JHR)

ATYA WARISH @ ATAY WARISH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6935/2026 · 2026-07-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:22184] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6935 of 2026 Atya Warish @ Atay Warish, aged about 20 years, son of Mohammad Afroz @ Mohammad Afroj, resident of H.No. 45, Park Lane Road, Doranda, Near Doranda College, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay , Adv. For the State : Mr. P.D.Agrawal, Spl. PP 02 / 27.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No- 161/26 instituted under Section 21(a), 20(b)(ii)(A), 27 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner along with the co-accused was in illegal possession of 3.82 gms of Brown sugar, which is also known as Heroin, 27.5 gms of Ganja and 13 pcs. of Pentazocine Injections containing morphine and all seized contra banned drugs are in small quantity and from exclusive possession of the petitioner, 0.94 gms. of brown sugar and 04 pcs. of Pentazocine injection and 01 pc. of syringe was recovered. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 13 of the bail application and the petitioner has been in jail custody since 02.07.2026 , as mentioned in para 14 of this bail application. It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum-Special Judge at Ranchi in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No- 161/26 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 27.07.2026 Smita/-