Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21948 (JHR)

RAHUL KUMAR @ RAHUL RAJAK v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6611/2026 · 2026-07-27

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:22042 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6611 of 2026 Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Rajak, Son of Mahendra Rajak … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Md. Syed Tafazzul Sajid, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, APP For the Informant : Mr. Ashok Kumar, Advocate --- 02/27.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties including the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant of the case. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026 in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No. 45 of 2026, registered under Sections 69, 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned J.M. 1st Class, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as per the allegation, the petitioner and the victim were having love relationship and they were living together since 2022. He submits that a child was also born. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the victim have jointly submitted that the petitioner and the victim are living together. 5. Learned counsel for the victim has submitted that the victim has no objection if the petitioner is released on bail. 6. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the aforesaid submissions, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Garhwa in connection with Dhurki P.S. Case No. 45 of 2026, on the following conditions: 2026:JHHC:22042 2 (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:27.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:28.07.2026