2026:JHHC:22043 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6625 of 2026 Md. Munna Babu, S/o- Md. Wakil Ansari … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Jai Mohan Mishra, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Saket Kumar, APP --- 04/27.07.2026 Heard the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2026 in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1175 of 2026 (S.T. Case No. 339 of 2026), registered under Section 64(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that as per the First Information Report itself, the victim was major and there is an allegation that the petitioner has established physical relationship with the victim and when she asked for marriage, the petitioner refused. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that charge- sheet has been submitted under section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. He submits that the FIR was lodged on 01.03.2026 and as per the FIR, the relationship started sometimes in the year, 2023. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party- State, on the other hand, has opposed the prayer for bail, but has not disputed the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. In view of the fact that charge-sheet has already been submitted and the petitioner and the victim have known each other since long, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-X, Dhanbad in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No. 83 of 2026 corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1175 of 2026 (S.T. Case No. 2026:JHHC:22043 2 339 of 2026), on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 7. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 8. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e- mail. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:27.07.2026 Pankaj Date of Uploading:28.07.2026