Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21942 (KAR)

H.P. BASAVARAJU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22369/2025 · 2026-06-11

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28124 WP No. 22369 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.22369 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. H.P. BASAVARAJU S/O. T. PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.74/1, HEGGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK 560087. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA B R.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28124 WP No. 22369 of 2025 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB- DIVISION, BENGALURU IN R.A.(A)NO.202/2018-19 (RD0050000 641093) DATED 18.03.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-H IN SO FAR IT IS OBJECTED. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. In this Writ Petition, petitioner is assailing the order dated 18.03.2025 in R.A.(A)NO.202/2018-19 (Annexure-H) passed by respondent No.2. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner places reliance on the Order dated 13.02.2026 passed in - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28124 WP No. 22369 of 2025 W.P.No.38675/2025, wherein this Court has quashed the impugned order in the present Writ Petition produced at Annexure-H. In that view of the matter, I find force in the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is allowed. The order dated 18.03.2025 in R.A.(A)NO.202/2018-19 passed by respondent No.2 is hereby quashed and the jurisdictional Tahsildar is directed to restore the entries as it stood prior to passing of the impugned order and the jurisdictional Tahsildar shall complete the said action within four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. With this observation, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2