Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21940 (CAL)

AJOY KUMAR AND ANR. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/12192/2026 · 2026-05-29

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L – 3 29/05/2026 Court. No. 2 S.Kundu Vacation Bench WPA 12192 of 2026 Ajoy Kumar & Anr. Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Ms. Sulekha Mitra Mr. Manas Kr. Das Ms. R. Ghosh …for the petitioners. Mr. Rajdeep Mazumder …for the Respondent nos. 1 and 3. Mr. Sougata Mitra Ms. Soma Chakraborty …for the Purulia Municipality. 1. Affidavit of service filed today in Court on behalf of the petitioners is taken on record. 2. Report as filed today in Court be kept with the record. 3. The writ petitioners herein have challenged a demolition action taken in respect of the premises which is located admittedly within the District Court premises, Purulia. 4. Learned counsel for the Purulia Municipality places a report, which is the resolution of the District Level Safety and Security Committee wherein at Agenda no. 1. It has been noted by the Committee that removal of encroachment and unauthorised constructions in and around the Court Complexes of Sadar Court, Purulia shall be undertaken by the authority concerned. 2 5. Considering that the learned District Judge, Purulia is the person-in-charge and the administrative head of the District premises, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the issue at this stage and the writ application is disposed of with the liberty granted to the petitioners to approach the learned District Judge, Purulia praying for relief and the learned District Judge shall be at liberty to decide the same in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities. (Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)