- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28355 RSA No. 215 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.215 OF 2017 BETWEEN: SRI. MUDDAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. RAMAPPA @ AITHAPPA GOWDA, RESIDENT OF MAVAJI IN MANDEKOLU VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT-574 239. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRAVEEN KUMAR K.N.,ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) AND: 1. SRI. RAMACHANDRA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, S/O. LATE KITTAPPA GOWDA, 2. DASAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, S/O. LATE KITTAPPA GOWDA. 3. DEVAIAH GOWDA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, S/O. HOSOKLU RAMANNA GOWDA, 4. THANGAMMA (SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LR’S I.E, RESPONDENT NO.1,2 AND 5) AMENDED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 07-08-2023 NO-1 TO 4, ARE RESIDENTS OF MANDEKOLU VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI B N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28355 RSA No. 215 of 2017 D.K. DISTRICT-574 239. 5. KORAGAPPA GOWDA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, S/O. LATE KITTAPPA GOWDA, C/O. ARMY NO.-139891301, ADMPL 427 DAMB, C/O. 99APO (W.B.) 6. BHAGIRATHI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, W/O. BALAKRISHNA GOWDA, D/O. LATE KITTAPPA GOWDA, R/O. MAVAJI HOUSE, THODIKANA VILLAGE, SULLIA TLAUK, D.K. DISTRICT-574 239. 7. CHANDRAVATHI AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, W/O.NARKOKLU GANGADHARA GOWDA, D/O.LATE KITTAPPA GOWDA, R/O.NARKOKLU, ALETTY VILLAGE, SULLIA TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT-574 239. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.R.SRINIVASA GOWDA.,ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3 AND R5 TO R7, VIDE ORDER DATED 07.08.2023, R1,R2 AND R5 ARE TREATED AS LR’S OF R4) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 R/W ORDER XLII RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.10.2016 PASSED IN RA NO.5007/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K. MANGALURU, SITTING AT PUTTUR D.K DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 2.2.2009 PASSED IN OS NO.27/1996 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND JMFC., PUTTUR, D.K AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28355 RSA No. 215 of 2017 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant. 2. Matter was listed for admission on 02.06.2026 and 09.06.2026 and time was granted at the request of the appellant. 3. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant to proceed with the matter. Matter is of the year 2017 and yet in the stage of admission. Perused the papers, plaintiff’s second appeal challenging the dismissal of the suit by recording concurrent finding. Suit is also one for permanent injunction. Accordingly, appeal stand dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE GSR,List No.: 1 Sl No.: 70