Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21935 (KAR)

VISHWABHARATHI HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/18482/2021 · 2026-06-15

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28911 WP No. 18482 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 18482 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: VISHWABHARATHI HOUSE BUILDING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO.335, RATHNA VILAS ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU - 560 004 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY SMT. SARASWATHI KESARKAR …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANJEEV B.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001 2. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OP SOCIETIES BENGALURU DIVISION, CO-OPERATIVE SOUDHA NO.146, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, 3RD FLOOR, MALLESHWARAM BENGALURU - 560 003 Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28911 WP No. 18482 of 2021 3. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE KARNATAKA STATE NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BENGALURU - 560 001 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 5. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER SOUTH DIVISION, BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK, K G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 6. THE TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR NADAKACHERI, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK KG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 7. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR OFFICE OF THE TAHSILDAR NADAKACHERI, KENGERI HOBLI BENGALURU SOUTH TALUK KG ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 009 8. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF KARNATAKA KANDAYA BHAAVANA 7TH FLOOR, K G ROAD BENGALURU - 560 009 9. THE SUB REGISTRAR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28911 WP No. 18482 of 2021 JAYANAGARA BENGALURU - 560 011 10. THE SUB-REGISTRAR KENGERI BENGALURU - 560 011 11. KARNATAKA ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU NO.49, KHANIJA BHAVAN, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 001 REP BY ADGP. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MANJUNATHA RAYAPPA, AGA FOR R1 SRI. Y.K.N. SHARMA, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANTS 1,2,3,4 AND 14 SRI. P.B. AJIT, ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON IA 1/2022 SRI. B.B. PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R11 SRI. RAJESH M., ADVOCATE FOR IMPLEADING APPLICANT ON I.A.NO.1/2026) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-DIRECT THE ANTI- CORRUPTION BUREAU R-11 TO INVESTIGATE THE MATTER WITH REGARD TO DERELICTION DUTY, CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY WITH THE LANDS GRABBERS AGAINST THE R-4 TO 10 AND THEIR NEXUS WITH THE LAND MAFIA AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28911 WP No. 18482 of 2021 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 15.06.2026 seeking withdrawal of the writ petition, which reads as under: "The Petitioner in the above matter most respectfully prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the Petitioner to withdraw the present Writ Petition, reserving liberty to initiate appropriate contempt proceedings against the Respondents. Consequently, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above Writ Petition as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity." 2. Learned counsel for the respondent raises a serious objection with regard to the above memo to the extent, petitioner seeking liberty to initiate contempt proceedings. He submits there is no question of contempt proceedings on the alleged disobedience order, and even if there is any disobedience, which is not in this case, petitioner is entitled to initiate proceedings for disobedience, but contempt would not arise. 3. At this juncture, counsel for the petitioner would submit that he would not press for liberty for initiating contempt proceedings. However, if there is any violation of the - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28911 WP No. 18482 of 2021 order passed by this court, he would initiate proceeding for such disobedience. 4. Submissions placed on record. 5. Accordingly, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE HDK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16