Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2193 (CAL)

DALIM SEKH @ DALIM SK AND ORS. v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL

CRM (A)/465/2026 · 2026-02-24

Jay Sengupta

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

24/02/2026 D/L – 41 Court No.28 S. Kundu Rejected C.R.M.(A) 465 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Samsherganj P.S case no. 1080 of 2025 dated 18/11/2025 under sections 126(2)/118(2)/109(1)/3(5) of the BNS. In the matter of: Dalim Sekh @ Dalim Sk & Ors. ...Petitioners. Ms. Minoti Gomes Ms. B. Hasna Mr. S. Haider …for the petitioners. Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee Mr. Karan Bapuli …for the State. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that he petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. An altercation between the friends led to the incident in question. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the injury reports which show injuries inflicted upon the petitioners including one stab injuries on the chest. He also relies on the statements of the victim and other witnesses. 3. Considering the above and the other incriminating materials available in the case diary, I do not consider this to be a fit case to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2 4. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Jay Sengupta, J.)