Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21929 (JHR)

MUKESH KUMAR @ MUKESH MEHTA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6889/2026 · 2026-07-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:22089 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6889 of 2026 ------ Mukesh Kumar @ Mukesh Mehta, aged about 34 years, son of late Ramchandra Prasad Mehta @ late Ram Chandra Mehta, resident of Village-Dangi, P.O.-Dumroan, P.S.-Ichak, Dist.- Hazaribag, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Santosh Kr. Soni, Advocate : Mr. Manish Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kr. Ganjhu, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 27.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.54 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 309(6) & 103(1) of the B.N.S., 2023. This is the second journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail was dismissed as withdrawn. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery and looted huge amount of Rs.15,00,000/- and also committed the murder of Shankar Kumar. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false and the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is next submitted that without putting the petitioner on T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in para-12 of this bail application, charge sheet has been submitted in this case. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined as yet and except suspicion, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 04.04.2026 as has been mentioned in para-06 of this bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.08.2025 in B.A. No.6716 of 2025. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Hazaribagh in connection with Ichak P.S. Case No.54 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 27.07.2026 Gunjan-