Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21927 (KAR)

H. P. BASAVARAJU v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/22377/2025 · 2026-06-12

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28487 WP No. 22377 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.22377 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. H. P. BASAVARAJU S/O. T. PAPANNA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO.74/1, HEGGONDANAHALLI VILLAGE, SARJAPURA HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK 560 087. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA B.R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB-DIVISION, KANDHAYA BHAVAN, K.R. ROAD, BENGALURU-560009. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28487 WP No. 22377 of 2025 3. THE TAHSILDAR, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT-562106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. B.P. RADHA, AGA ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2, ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, BENGALURU SOUTH SUB- DIVISION, BENGALURU IN R.A.(A)NO.207/2018.19 (RD005000640973) DATED 18.03.2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-F. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER In this writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 18.03.2025 (Annexure–F) passed by Respondent No. 2. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. This Court, in W.P. No. 38675 of 2025, disposed of on 13.02.2026, has already quashed the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28487 WP No. 22377 of 2025 very same impugned order. Therefore, I am of the view that the present writ petition deserves to be disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition. 4. In that view of the matter, the concerned Tahsildar is directed to restore the revenue entries as they stood prior to the passing of the impugned order, within an outer limit of four weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4