Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2192 (RAJ)

KUNWAR SINGH S/O MOHAN LAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6083/2026 · 2026-04-21

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16758] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6083/2026 Kunwar Singh S/o Mohan Lal, R/o Nagla Bhawla, Police Station Khedli Mod, District Bharatpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail, Bayana) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Nagayach For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/04/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.156/2025 registered at Police Station Kherli Mod, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that though there are allegations against the present petitioner regarding the death of the deceased, Samander Singh but there is no direct evidence available for the alleged offence. The FIR lodger Gaurav Kumar has been examined before the Trial Court as PW-2 who admitted that he is not an eyewitness to the alleged incident. It is further submitted that out of a total of 10 witnesses [2026:RJ-JP:16758] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6083/2026] examined so far, 7 witnesses, including the wife of the deceased, have not supported the case of the prosecution and have been declared hostile. The remaining examined witnesses are either formal in nature or have stated that they were not present at the time of the alleged incident. Petitioner is behind the bars since 09.08.2025. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Kunwar Singh S/o Mohan Lal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/24