CRM-M-31186 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 150 DEEPAK KASANA STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to 318, 61(2) of immediately, transfer the investigation to other 2. petitioner No.2. The l decide the abovementioned representation within 3. 31186-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH DEEPAK KASANA VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Advocate Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents to register the FIR under Sections 338, 336, 318, 61(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, immediately, transfer the investigation to other The learned counsel representing r has filed the representation (Annexure P The learned counsel prays for directions to decide the abovementioned representation within Notice of motion. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-31186-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana. as been filed by the petitioner to register the FIR under Sections 338, 336, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, against the accused persons immediately, transfer the investigation to other police station. sel representing the petitioner submits that the (Annexure P-6) before the respondent earned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 decide the abovementioned representation within the stipulated time. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONER .....RESPONDENTS for to register the FIR under Sections 338, 336, against the accused persons the petitioner submits that the respondent respondent No.2 to GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-31186 hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner (Annexure P Faridabad (respondent No.2) officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that merits of the contents of representation. liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of representation of the petitioner level. 6. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 31186-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana Hence service of notice hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner (Annexure P-6) be disposed of either by the Faridabad (respondent No.2) or, on assignmen officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however clarified that no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. berty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of epresentation of the petitioner, and take an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG Haryana Hence service of notice upon the State Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner ) be disposed of either by the Commissioner of Police, or, on assignment by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to merits of the contents of representation. The respondent No.2 shall be at berty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of , and take an independent decision at his own In view of above, the present petition is hereby disposed of. :Yes/No : Yes/No upon the State is Keeping in view the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that by passing a speaking order within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order, the representation of petitioner Commissioner of Police, t by him, by any other police officer not below the rank of Deputy Commissioner of Police. It is however no finding is being returned, by this Court, with regard to shall be at berty to make an independent assessment with regard to contents of , and take an independent decision at his own GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document