Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21916 (DEL)

RUPESH SAINI v. THE STATE GNCT ( DELHI) & ANR.

CRL.M.C./2977/2026 · 2026-10-13

Girish Kathpalia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL.M.C. 2977/2026 Page 1 of 2 pages $~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 13.10.2026 # CNR No. DLHC010163502026 + CRL.M.C. 2977/2026 RUPESH SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person (through videoconferencing) versus THE STATE GNCT (DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Santosh Kumar Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate for R2 with R2 in person (through videoconferencing) CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 330/2021 of PS Adarsh Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.13 17:28:40 +05'30' CRL.M.C. 2977/2026 Page 2 of 2 pages 3. The respondent no.2 is present through videoconferencing and is identified by IO/SI Santosh Kumar. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioner. Marriage between petitioner and respondent no.2 stands already dissolved by way of decree of divorce. No child was born from the wedlock of petitioner and respondent no.2. The respondent no.2 submits that she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her entire stridhan and maintenance. Respondent no.2 submits that now she does not wish to continue prosecution of petitioner. 4. Having spoken with respondent no.2, I am satisfied that it would be in the interest of justice not to push the parties through full dress trial. 5. Therefore, the petition is allowed and FIR No. 330/2021 of PS Adarsh Nagar for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC as well as proceedings arising out of the same are quashed. GIRISH KATHPALIA (JUDGE) OCTOBER 13, 2026/as GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570 996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2026.10.13 17:28:26 +05'30'