Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21914 (JHR)

SUSHIT KUJUR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6932/2026 · 2026-07-27

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[ 2026:JHHC:22180] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6932 of 2026 Sushit Kujur, aged about 21 years, son of Sarojani Kujur, resident of Hinoo Basti, Shukla Colony, Hinoo, P.O. & P.S.- Doranda, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Pran Pranay, Adv. For the State : Mr. P.D.Agrawal, Spl. PP 02 / 27.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.150 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 21(a), 20(b) (ii)A & 27 of NDPS Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in sale and purchase of brown sugar which is also known as heroin and from the co- accused taken together, 3.67 gm of brown sugar and 21.99 gm of Ganja was recovered while from the petitioner 0.90 gm of brown sugar and 06.50 gm of Ganja was recovered. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that both Ganja and brown sugar come under small quantity. It is then submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-13 of this bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant/victim or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 16.06.2026 as has been mentioned in para-14 of this bail. It is next submitted that the co- accused with similar allegations have already been admitted on bail by this court vide order dated 21.07.2026 passed in B.A. no. 6785 of 2026; hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Spl.. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner-cum- Special Judge at Ranchi in connection with Doranda P.S. Case No.150 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 27.07.2026 Smita/-