IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.9937 of 2026 Cosboard Industries Ltd., Cuttack and Another …. Petitioners Ms. S. Senapati, Adv. on behalf of Mr. S.J. Biswal, Advocate -versus- The Executive Engineer (Elec.) T.P. Central Odisha Distribution Ltd., CESU Colony, Cuttack …. Opposite Parties Ms. R. Jena, Advocate on behalf of Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate for TPCODL COROM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 06.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner fairly contended that even though the disputed amount pursuant to Annexure-2 has already been deposited on protest but the authorities are in the process to disconnect the power supply. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Party- TPCODL on the other hand contended that the demand so raised in Annexure-2 is to be challenged before the Grievance Redressal Forum. 5. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission made, this Court is of the view that the dispute involved under Annexure-2 is not amenable to the writ jurisdiction of this Court. It is open for the petitioners to challenge the demand if he is otherwise aggrieved even though the demanded amount has been deposited on protest, before the appropriate forum. 6. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev