ARBIND KUMAR SAW @ LADDU SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10706/2025 · 2026-02-10
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2191 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2191 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:3563 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10706 of 2025
------ Arbind Kumar Saw @ Laddu Saw, S/o Amar Saw, R/o Golden Pahari, Surunga, PO- Surunga, PS- Tisra, Distt:- Dhanbad.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
………..
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
………..
For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Nandan Chatterjee, Advocate
For the State
: Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, APP
------
Order No.3 / Dated : 10.02.2026.
Heard both the sides.
The petitioner, above-named who is in custody in connection with Tisra (Dhanbad) P.S. Case No. 51 of 2025 for the offence registered under Sections 317(4), 317(5), 112, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 has prayed for regular bail.
As per the prosecution case, five stolen motorcycles were recovered, two from the football ground and three from the forest area at the instance of the petitioner and co-accused persons. The petitioner was apprehended from the football ground.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the petitioner has no concern with the stolen motorcycles and except confessional statement, there is no other material against him.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. It is submitted that the matter involves an organized crime gang of motorcycle lifters, and on the basis of disclosure statement of the petitioner and others, the stolen motorcycles were recovered. Further, the petitioner has also criminal antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and gravity of offence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sandeep/
Uploaded