IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 204 Parminder Singh @ Parwinder Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Present: SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL 1. FIR No.34 dated Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda. petition for anticipatory 2. 40 years, who of beatings 09.02.2026 HC statement. A gate was watching the bed in drunken wanted the police IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: Singh @ Parwinder Singh V/S Punjab and another CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Mr. Sahil Siddharth Jain, Advocate Mr. Gobind Singh Randhawa, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punjab Mr. Rajinder Singh Sukhladhi, Advocate for respondent No.2 (through V.C.). **** SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL J.(ORAL) Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail dated 10.02.2026, under Section Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda. anticipatory bail. The FIR was registered on complaint who stated that she was admitted in given by her son-in-law, his HC Jaswant Singh came to the hospital t that time, a man in civil dress, watching her from a distance. At about drunken state and asked her to police to take action in the complaint. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CRM-M-21524-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.05.2026 …Petitioner …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL Advocate for Mr. Gobind Singh Randhawa, Advocate Mr. Akash Yadav, AAG, Punjab. Mr. Rajinder Singh Sukhladhi, Advocate (through V.C.). Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in case arising out of , under Sections 64, 76, 62 of BNS, Police Station City Rampura, District Bathinda. This is the first complaint of prosecutrix aged in the hospital on account father and brother. On hospital for recording her dress, who was standing at the about 2:00 A.M. he came to make him happy, if she complaint. Thereafter, he lay KAPIL 2026.05.28 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-21524-2026 (O&M) -2- down on the bed, touched her inappropriately, forced her into the room and tried to have sexual intercourse after turning off the light. On seeing Amandeep Kaur wife of Sukhminder Singh and her husband, he left the spot. 3. Learned counsel submits that petitioner was innocent and was falsely implicated. There was no CCTV footage of the incident collected by the police. FIR was registered after delay of four days. The matter had since been compromise with the complainant who had sworn an affidavit Annexure P-2 that petitioner did not commit any act of inappropriate touching or forcing himself. Petitioner was ready and willing to join investigation. 4. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that the prosecutrix supported FIR version in her statement under Section 183 BNSS. Further, the police had collected a video recording and photographs of the petitioner scuffling with the complainant. 5. Allegations against the petitioner are direct and specific. Offences involved are grave and pertain to attempt to violate a 40 year old lady in the hospital. There are no extraordinary circumstances to release petitioner on anticipatory bail nor a fit case to exercise discretion under Section 482 BNSS.. 6. Dismissed. (SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL) 27.05.2026 JUDGE Kapil Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No KAPIL 2026.05.28 18:36 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document