ABDUL RASID MIYAN ALIAS RASID MIYAN @ AB. RASHEED v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./6937/2026 · 2026-07-27
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21899 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21899 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:22185] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6937 of 2026
Abdul Rasid Miyan @ Rasid Miyan @ Ab. Rasheed, aged about 42 years, Son of Md. Naim, Resident of at House No. 465/890, Anshik Auri P.O. + P.S. -Sonbhadra, District Sonbhadra, State Uttar-Pradesh Permanent Resident of at village Hethpochra, P.O. + P.S.-Latehar, District- Latehar, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
… Opp. Party
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Vishal Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Satish Prasad, Addl. PP
02 / 27.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026 correspondent to G.R. Case No. 469 of 2026 instituted under Section 108, 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused, has abetted the commission of suicide of the husband of the informant namely Ikbal Ashrfi by constantly quarrelling with the deceased; who is the brother of the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent, as mentioned in paragraph 9 of the bail application and charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in jail custody since 07.04.2026 , as mentioned in para 13 of this bail application.
It is next submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the trial of the case and undertakes not to annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case; hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. Learned Addl. P.P. opposed the prayer for bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioner on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2026 correspondent to G.R. Case No. 469 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will not annoy or disturb the informant or the other witness of the case in any manner during trial of the case and will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish mobile phone number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change the mobile phone number during the trial of the case.
(ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.)
Dated 27.07.2026
Smita/-