2026:JHHC:22069 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3378 of 2026 Jitendra Das @ Jitendra Kumar Das, son of Dinesh Das … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. PP --- 07/27.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2026 in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.32 of 2026, registered under Sections 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) of BNS, 2023 and Sections 66B, 66 C, 66 D and 84 (C ) of I.T. Act, now pending in the court of learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar. 3. A supplementary counter affidavit has been filed by the State during the court proceedings, which is taken on record. 4. The learned counsel for the State has submitted that as per the report, no other case has been registered against the petitioner in the State of Jharkhand or in any other State, except the present case. 5. The learned counsel submits that so far as the case reported in Katras, Dhanbad is concerned, it has come that after the lodging of the case, the victim got back Rs.42,000/- out of Rs.49,401/-, which was the defrauded amount, and therefore, no case was instituted. 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that 3 mobiles and 3 sims are alleged to have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2026 having no criminal antecedent. The charge sheet has been submitted on 29.05.2026 and charge has been framed on 09.07.2026. 7. The learned counsel for the State though has opposed the prayer for bail but the aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for 2026:JHHC:22069 2 the petitioner is not in dispute. 8. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and charge has already been framed, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-(Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge – II – cum – Cyber Crime Special Court, Deoghar in connection with Cyber P.S. Case No.32 of 2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 9. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 10. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:27.07.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:28.07.2026