IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 15344/2026 Decided on: 03.09.2026 Sunil Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Petitioner seeks direction to the respondents to pay him contractual emoluments of Rs.10,800/- per month with effect from 30.10.2020 till the regularization of his services, i.e. on 29.04.2023, with all benefits incidental thereof. Petitioner's grievance is that the representation dated 04.03.2026, preferred in that regard has still not been considered & decided till date by respondent No.3. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner would be content, in case, the said respondent/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 with law, within a time bound manner. Learned Deputy Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. Having regard to the above submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, the instant writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.3/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 3rd September, 2026 (Rohit)