ANIL S/O. GANJIDHAR PAWAR v. MADHAV VINAYAK KULKARNI AND OTHERS
WP/1552/2018 · 2026-01-08
Shri Y G Khobragade
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21892 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21892 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
902-Cri-WP-1552-2018.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 902 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1552 OF 2018 ANIL S/O. GANJIDHAR PAWAR VERSUS MADHAV VINAYAK KULKARNI AND OTHERS .… Mr. K. S. Patil, APP for Respondent No.8 – State .… CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. DATE : January 08, 2026 PER COURT :-
1. The party-in-person is absent. On 22.11.2018 and also on 03.12.2025, the party-in-person was absent. Lastly, on 10.12.2025, this Court passed the following order:-
“1. Vide order dated 3rd December 2025, it was directed to the office to intimate the party in person.
2. It appears that the office has not intimated to the concerned party in person. Hence, by way of last chance, put up after vacation.
3. Registry is again directed to intimate the party in person.”
2. As per the office note dated 07.01.2026, the party-in- person is served by e-mail and post. Despite this fact, the party in person remained absent. Therefore, it shows that the petitioner 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:372
(( 2 )) 902-Cri-WP-1552-2018 has no interest in prosecuting the matter. Therefore, no option is left with this Court except to dismiss the petition for want of prosecution.
3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ]
SMS 2 of 2