IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1861 of 2026 Date of Decision: 03.09.2026 _______________________________________________________ Sushama Devi …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Vishwajeet Singh, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Susheel Gautam, Advocate, for respondent No.3. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that on account of subsequent developments, present petition has been rendered infructuous and accordingly, the same be disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, laying therein challenge to order passed in purported compliance of the judgment, sought to be executed. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 03, 2026 (sunil) 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?