Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2189 (GAU)

SMTI DITIMONI MEDAK v. SMTI MAMATA HOJAI, AES

Cont.Cas(C)/607/2025 · 2026-03-22

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010250802025 2026:GAU-AS:4149 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/607/2025 SMTI DITIMONI MEDAK W/O SRI RANJIT KAMAN, R/O ALIMOR BALIGAON, P.O.- MORNOI BEBEJIA, P.S.- GHILAMARA, DIST- LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM, PIN-787055, ASSISTANT TEACHER IN THE SUBANSIRI KAIRBATA HIGH SCHOOL, LAKHIMPUR, ASSAM VERSUS SMTI MAMATA HOJAI, AES THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA-19, DIST KAMRUP (METRO), GUWAHATI-781019 Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS A BUJARBARUAH, MS A.SARMA Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE, MR. U SARMA BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 23.03.2026 Heard Ms. A. Bujarbaruah, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor. 2. Mr. Chistie, learned counsel for the alleged contemnor by placing a copy of Page No.# 2/2 the speaking order dated 03.02.2026, passed by the Director of Secondary Education, Assam submits that the order dated 10.04.2025, passed by this Court in WP(C) No. 2054/2025 has duly been complied with as upon verification of records, the petitioner is not entitled for provincialization on the ground of not having six years continuous service as on 01.01.2017. 3. Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed. 4. A copy of the speaking order dated 03.02.2026 is kept on record and marked as document ‘X’. JUDGE Comparing Assistant