Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21883 (KAR)

SRI NARASINGAPPA v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

RP/510/2025 · 2026-06-11

E S Indiresh

Review Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28121 RP No. 510 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REVIEW PETITION NO.510 OF 2025 BETWEEN: SRI. NARASINGAPPA S/O LATE M. HANUMANTHRAO, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, 2ND MAIN ROAD, RESIDING AT PLOT NO.301, BASAPPA ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 027. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SARITHA A.L., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, 1ST FLOOR, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, BEERASANDRA VILLAGE, KUNDANA HOBLI, DEVANAHALLI TALUK - 563 101. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION, DODDABALLAPURA, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT, BENGALURU - 563 201. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28121 RP No. 510 of 2025 3. THE TAHASILDAR, HOSAKOTE TALUK, HOSAKOTE 563 201, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 4. SRI. GOPINATH RAO, S/O LATE N G RAMRAO, AAGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/AT NO.40, SRI LAKSHMI NIVAS, NEW KEMPEGOWDA EXTENSION, KATHRIGUPPE, BENGALURU - 560 085. 5. SRI SHRINIVASRAO D R, S/O LATE N G RAMRAO, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT NO.44, SAUNDARYA SCHOOL ROAD, HAVANUR EXTENSION, NAGASANDRA POST, BENGALURU - 560 073. …RESPONDENTS THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF CPC R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC 1908, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 28.11.2022 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 19047/2019 (KLR RR/SUR) AND DISPOSE OF THE WRIT PETITION AFRESH ON MERITS TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS ALONG WITH I.A.1/2025, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28121 RP No. 510 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking to review the order dated 28.11.2022 passed in W.P.No.19047/2019 produced at Annexure- A to the Writ Petition. 2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner on I.A.1/2025, there is no sufficient cause shown to condone the delay of 1059 days in filing the review petition. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that application I.A.1/2023 was filed, wherein liberty was reserved to file the Review Petition and hence, the present Review Petition is filed by the petitioner. 4. However, taking into consideration the reasons stated in the affidavit accompanying the application, I am of the view that, the Review Petition cannot be accepted on the ground of delay and laches as there is no sufficient cause shown to condone the delay in filing the Review Petition. Accordingly, both I.A.1/2025 and the Review Petition are dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6