933-WP-13317-2019.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 933 WRIT PETITION NO. 13317 OF 2019 Ahmednagar Jilha Prathamik Shikshan Sahakari Bank Ltd Though Director Raju Vasant Mungase VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ….. Mr. Suryawanshi Sanket N., Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for the Respondents - State ….. CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 08.01.2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard the learned Counsel for the respective parties. 2. By way of the present petition, the Petitioner assails the order dated 12.09.2018 passed by Respondent No.2, i.e. Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Societies, Nashik Division, Nashik in Revision Application No.R-170/2017, whereby, the Revision filed by the Petitioner came to be dismissed. 3. The proceeding arises out of an inquiry initiated under Section 83 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Socities Act, 1960 (For short ‘the Act’). On consideration of the record available, it is found that the District Deputy Registrar, after following due procedure, appointed an Inquiry Officer, who submitted his report dated 29.07.2017. From the record, it further reveals that, while conducting the inquiry under Section 83 of the Act, the Petitioner was duly heard and after 1 2026:BHC-AUG:435 933-WP-13317-2019.odt considering the material on record, the inquiry report was submitted. The said report was assailed by the Petitioner by filing a Revision. 4. The Revisional Authority, upon considering the entire record placed before it, found that the inquiry was conducted in accordance with due procedure of law. In view of the observations and findings recorded by the learned Revisional Authority, I do not find any reason to interfere with the order dated 12.09.2018 passed by Respondent No.2, i.e. Divisional Joint Registrar Co-Societies, Nashik Division, Nashik in Revision Application No.R-170/2017. 5. Hence, the petition stands dismissed. No order as to costs. [SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.] Sameer/January-2026 2