Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21883 (AP)

B.Govindu S/o Chidambarappa v. The Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/23573/2013 · 2026-03-11

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 HN, J W.P.No.23573_2013 APHC010315832013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23573/2013 Between: 1. B.GOVINDU S/O CHIDAMBARAPPA,, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC:FIELD ASSISTANT, RESIDENT OF DEVANABANDA VILLAGE, PATTIKONDA MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS DISTRICT COLLECTOR & DISTRICT, PROGRAMME CO- ORDINATOR, NREGS, A.P., KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 2. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR/ADDITIONAL PROGRAMME OFFICER, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, NREGS, KURNOOL DISTRICT, KURNOOL. 3. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, PATTIKONDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in passing the impugned orders (1) R.C.No.200/PE/SA/2011, dated 12-9-2011 by the 2'd respondent (2) R.C.No.200/PE/SA/2011, dated 17-01-2012, (3) R.C.No.200/PE/SA/2011, dated 19-03-2013, as illegal, improper, arbitrary and against principles of Natural Justice, besides being violative of Art 2 HN, J W.P.No.23573_2013 14,16,17,19,21,309 & 311 of constitution of India, consequently direct the Respondents to reinstate me into service forth with, in the interest of Justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 28972 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to re-instate the petitino into service as field Assistant of Devanabanda Village, Pattikonda Mandal, Kurnool District pending disposal of above W.P. in the interest of Justice. o Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. R RAMANJANEYULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV 3 HN, J W.P.No.23573_2013 ORDER: 1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner before this Court today. 2. The learned Standing counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the contract period of the petitioner had expired, and thereafter he was not in the service of the respondents. 3. Considering the submission that the engagement of the petitioner was for a limited period of time, no further order needs to be passed in this present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:12.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.23573_2013 16 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23573 of 2013 Date: 12.03.2026 NKA