1 APHC010315072013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 39198/2013 Between: 1. DR. B.R.AMBEDKAR S.C. YOUTH ASSOCIATION,, (REGD NO. 1971/99), KAKARA APPA RAO STREET, 29TH WARD, S.V.P.NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 01, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, G.NAGA RAJU, S/O. LAKSHMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O. H.NO. 32-34-102, S.V.P.NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. KOBBARITHOTA POLAMAMBA VADA BAJA YUVAJANA, SEVA SANGHAM, (REGD NO. 542/2010), S.V.P. NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530001 REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, B.SATHI RAJU, S/O. APPANNA, AGED 37 YEARS, R/O. 32-34-155/1, S.V.P.NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM 3. SRI ADISAKTHI POLAMAMBA DEVALAYAM, YUVAJANA SEVA SANGHAM (REGD. NO. 376/2006) S.V.P. NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, FISH MARKET STREET, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, G.SRINIVASA RAO, S/O. CHINNA SATTAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. 32-35-68, S.V. P. NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM 4. SRI SRI SRI DURGAMAMBA KALANJAYA SANGHAM,, DOOR NO. 33-32-319, S.V.P. NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, 75 FEET ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM - 1, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT, P.ARJUNAMMA, W/O. ARJUNA RAO, R/O. 32-32-319, S.V. P. NAGAR, KOBBARITHOTA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...PETITIONER(S) 2 AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD 2. THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. K SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MOHD ZAFRULLAH 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri K. Srinivasa Rao, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, submits that the Writ Petitioners have not been in touch with the Petitioners’ Counsel since 2014. He would submit that despite best efforts, learned Counsel could not get in touch with any of the Writ Petitioner Nos.2 to 4, who represent Writ Petitioner No.1. 2. Having so recorded, this Court deems it appropriate to dismiss this Writ Petition for Non-prosecution. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for Non-prosecution as the Writ Petitioners have failed to render any instructions to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:10.03.2026 Vns