1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 1060 of 2026 Decided on: 03.09.2026 ________________________________________________ Nikhil Patiyal & Anr. ....Petitioners Versus Isha Thakur …Respondent _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Rajesh Kashyap, Advocate. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned counsel for the respondent has filed compliance affidavit in the open Court today, alongwith order dated 21.08.2026, wherein it has been stated that the matter has been examined in consultation with the legal cell and was also placed before the competent authority and the competent authority of the Board has decided to implement the judgment dated 11.05.2026 in CWP No. 2181 of 2016, titled Nikhil Patiyal and another Vs. HPSEBL in its letter and 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 spirit subject to final outcome of the SLP (C) 28163 of 2023 titled HPSEBL Vs. Ashish Sharma as well as SLP proposed in the present case. 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioners to avail appropriate remedy, as available to them under the law, if they are still aggrieved. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 3rd September, 2026 Judge (raman)