Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21868 (AP)

G.V.Sitaramaraju v. The Station House Officer

WP/14592/2019 · 2026-02-10

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010313872019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 14592/2019 Between: 1. G.V.SITARAMARAJU, S/O. V.V.SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT.65 YEARS, R/O. 3-1-11, PENNADA VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PALAKODERU MANDAL POLICE STATION, PALAKODERU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,A.P 2. KALIDINDI PADMAVATI, W/O.RAGHAV RAJU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.R/O. 3-138/1, PENNADA VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,A.P 3. KALIDINDI RAGHAV RAJU, S/O. BANGARU RAJU, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS.R/O. 3-138/1, PENNADA VILLAGE, PALAKODERU MANDAL. WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, A.P 4. THE STATE OF A P, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME 'DEPORTMENT, SECRETERIAT ALAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI,GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ particularly in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the in action of the lst respondent in not arresting the 2nd respondent in pursuance ,of the 2 orders passed by the Hon'ble IInd Additional Judicial Ist class Magistrate at Bhimavaram as the same is illegal arbitrary and unjust and consequently direct the 1st respondent to arrest the respondent in pursuance of the orders passed by the Honorable IInd Additional Judicial 1st class Magistrate at Bhimavaram IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the lst respondent to arrest the 2" respondent in pursuance of the orders passed by the Hon'ble Aaditiondi :judicial 1st class Magistrate at Bhimavaram Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G RAVI MOHAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.14592 OF 2019 ORDER: None appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournments also. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. 3. In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 11.02.2026 Dmr 4 114 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:14592 OF 2019 Date: 11.02.2026 W Dmr